Dive into a compelling discussion about the prudence of U.S. foreign policy. This segment critically examines the notion of initiating "another war of choice," arguing it profoundly undermines the nation's fundamental interests.
The speaker powerfully asserts that such conflicts are not only counterproductive but directly contradict the core principles and strategic objectives of the United States. This prompts viewers to consider the true cost and implications of engaging in optional military action.
Subscribe to the BrightVideos.com email newsletter to receive a daily digest of the most important and popular videos uploaded each day. (You can unsubscribe at any time.)
Transcript
How could it possibly be in the in the United States' national interest to initiate another war of choice? It can't be. It's not in our interest. It can't be. No, it's not. It's not. It's actually contradicts our interests of trying to keep energy prices low. 100% correct. The Iranians are no threat to us. And if the Israelis really believe that the Iranians are an existential threat to them, then maybe they should engage with the Omanis or the Algerians or the Saudis or the Emiratis or even the Gutteries to try to come to some sort of a diplomatic solution. But Netanyahu flying to the United States every two months and begging whoever happens to be president to to destroy Iran for him. That's just not that's not in the US's national interest. Welcome to today's interview here on Brighton.com. I'm Mike Adams, the founder of Brighton. And today we're joined by a very special person. A first-time guest here on the show but someone who I I must have seen a hundred of his interviews and his name is John Kiriaku and he's a former CIA counterterrorism case officer, earlier an analyst and he's got some ...
