FDA's Absurd Food vs. Drug Stance: A Violation of Reality

It seems to me that for the FDA to maintain this position that you just described as the regulator, they have to pretend that molecules in pharmaceuticals do things in human physiology, but molecules in food and supplements do not do things. And that is a total violation of reality, the laws of chemistry, physiology, neurology, you name it. But that is what they are pretending. It's like the emperor wears no clothes, you know? Yeah, it's very much so. And it's it's even worse because they pretend that foods are not therapeutic. I mean, how crazy is that? I mean, who among us says that if you don't eat food, you're going to die? Everyone. The the the reality is food is therapeutic. It at least keeps you alive. Well, of course, it keeps you alive, but also it does much more than that. It can actually eliminate disease or reduce the risk of disease or expand your life. It it's it's enormously uh therapeutic. And yet we have this artificial distinction in the law that says no, you may not call a food a drug, because if you say a food treats, mitigates, prevents disease, it's automatically prohibited ...